In re the Langdon Road

Hamilton County Probate Court

In re the Langdon Road

1 Goebel 210

DecidedApril 3, 1889

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Goebel 210 (In re the Langdon Road) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hamilton County Probate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Langdon Road, 1 Goebel 210 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Goebel, J.

[212]*212ist. The' viewers having included in their report, an award of compensation and damages, without payment of which the road could not be established, under section 999 Rev. Stat, the Board of Control has jurisdiction.

2nd. The Board of Control having refused to concur in the action of the Board of County Commissioners, the giving of the bond and -the filing of the original papers in the Probate Court by the County Auditor, were unauthorized.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goebel, J.

[212]*212ist. The' viewers having included in their report, an award of compensation and damages, without payment of which the road could not be established, under section 999 Rev. Stat, the Board of Control has jurisdiction.

2nd. The Board of Control having refused to concur in the action of the Board of County Commissioners, the giving of the bond and -the filing of the original papers in the Probate Court by the County Auditor, were unauthorized.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Goebel 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-langdon-road-ohprobcthamilto-1889.