In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of Morrison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of Morrison

246 A.D. 834

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D. 834 (In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of Morrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of Morrison, 246 A.D. 834 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding in the Surrogate’s Court of Westchester county to settle the accounts of an executor. Decree unanimously affirmed, in so far as appealed from, with costs to executor-respondent, payable out of the estate. [835]*835Assuming that the extrinsic testimony received by the surrogate to ascertain the intent of the decedent was improperly received, the construction of the provisions of the will, so far as they concerned the objectant Ciani, was proper. Paragraphs third and tenth of the will are unambiguous, and the requirement that the legacy to Maude E. Ciani be subject to deduction “ of all advances ” is properly interpreted and applied to the payments made by the decedent to the objectant between the date of the death of decedent’s brother and the date of the making of decedent’s will. Present — Young, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding in the Surrogate’s Court of Westchester county to settle the accounts of an executor. Decree unanimously affirmed, in so far as appealed from, with costs to executor-respondent, payable out of the estate. [835]*835Assuming that the extrinsic testimony received by the surrogate to ascertain the intent of the decedent was improperly received, the construction of the provisions of the will, so far as they concerned the objectant Ciani, was proper. Paragraphs third and tenth of the will are unambiguous, and the requirement that the legacy to Maude E. Ciani be subject to deduction “ of all advances ” is properly interpreted and applied to the payments made by the decedent to the objectant between the date of the death of decedent’s brother and the date of the making of decedent’s will. Present — Young, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D. 834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-judicial-settlement-of-the-intermediate-account-of-proceedings-of-nyappdiv-1936.