In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of Erb
This text of 242 A.D. 631 (In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of Erb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion denied on authority of Matter of Carlino v. Downs (ante, p. 631), decided herewith. Moreover, the decree appealed from is inconclusive. The applicant may move to vacate the citation and service thereof upon it. In the event such a motion is denied it may appeal on a record that will present a practical question. A stay may then be granted on terms preserving the status quo pending an appeal to review the ruling claimed to aggrieve. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 A.D. 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-judicial-settlement-of-the-intermediate-account-of-proceedings-of-nyappdiv-1934.