In re the Judicial Settlement of the Final Account of Proceedings of Westchester Title & Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Final Account of Proceedings of Westchester Title & Trust Co.

242 A.D. 708

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 242 A.D. 708 (In re the Judicial Settlement of the Final Account of Proceedings of Westchester Title & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Final Account of Proceedings of Westchester Title & Trust Co., 242 A.D. 708 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondent, payable out of the estate. The proper practice is for the appellants to serve arproposed ease on appeal containing all that they claim they are entitled to have printed for a proper review in this court, and if proposed amendments are [709]*709served by respondent it will be for the surrogate to settle the proposed case and amendments (Surr. Ct. Act, § 294, and Rules Civ. Prac. rule 230), from whose order of settlement either or both parties may appeal to this court. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondent, payable out of the estate. The proper practice is for the appellants to serve arproposed ease on appeal containing all that they claim they are entitled to have printed for a proper review in this court, and if proposed amendments are [709]*709served by respondent it will be for the surrogate to settle the proposed case and amendments (Surr. Ct. Act, § 294, and Rules Civ. Prac. rule 230), from whose order of settlement either or both parties may appeal to this court. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D. 708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-judicial-settlement-of-the-final-account-of-proceedings-of-nyappdiv-1934.