In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of the Surviving of Koch

New York Surrogate's Court

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of the Surviving of Koch

2 Mills Surr. 106, 33 Misc. 672, 68 N.Y.S. 938

DecidedJanuary 15, 1901

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Mills Surr. 106 (In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of the Surviving of Koch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of the Surviving of Koch, 2 Mills Surr. 106, 33 Misc. 672, 68 N.Y.S. 938 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Thomas, S.1

— William Steencken, the deceased executor, was also a legatee, and he is not now represented in the proceeding. The accounting can proceed, notwithstanding his death, to adjust the accounts of the surviving executor, and to determine the amount of the estate remaining in his hands, [107]*107and to adjudge against him the costs of the litigation (Matter of Steencken, 51 App. Div. 417), but no distribution can be ordered until an administrator of the estate of Mr. Steencken is appointed and he has been brought before the court in some proper way and afforded a hearing. The assets are insufficient to pay all legacies in full, and this objection cannot be met by setting aside a part of the fund. The decree submitted is also objectionable in some formal respects, and I have had a decree prepared which may be examined by counsel before signature. A stipulation was entered in the stenographer’s minutes as having been made by “ the adult parties hereto ” at the beginning of the trial, to the effect that the fees of the referee and the stenographer should be paid out of the estate. The adult persons represented by counsel at this time were the executors, as such, and the widow. Wilhelmina Schumacher, a legatee, does not appear to have been represented by attorney at any stage of the proceeding, or to have joined in the stipulation. The disbursements for the fees of the referee and the stenographer were large, and the contest was more lengthy than was probably anticipated at the time when the stipulation was made. In my opinion, as to the main questions in the case, I have stated that these disbursements, as a part of the costs, should be charged against the surviving executor. The stipulation as to disbursements had not been called to my attention, and this may require a modification of the ruling. The question whether Mr. Steencken, as legatee, is bound by the stipulation, or whether this stipulation is binding upon the court, so as to control my discretion as to costs, and to compel a further rebate of the legacy of Mr. Steencken, should also be reserved until his representative is before the court. No question as to costs will, therefore, be finally determined in the decree now about to be entered, but all of such questions will be reserved until Mr. Steencken’s representative is before the court.

Decreed accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas, S.1

— William Steencken, the deceased executor, was also a legatee, and he is not now represented in the proceeding. The accounting can proceed, notwithstanding his death, to adjust the accounts of the surviving executor, and to determine the amount of the estate remaining in his hands, [107]*107and to adjudge against him the costs of the litigation (Matter of Steencken, 51 App. Div. 417), but no distribution can be ordered until an administrator of the estate of Mr. Steencken is appointed and he has been brought before the court in some proper way and afforded a hearing. The assets are insufficient to pay all legacies in full, and this objection cannot be met by setting aside a part of the fund. The decree submitted is also objectionable in some formal respects, and I have had a decree prepared which may be examined by counsel before signature. A stipulation was entered in the stenographer’s minutes as having been made by “ the adult parties hereto ” at the beginning of the trial, to the effect that the fees of the referee and the stenographer should be paid out of the estate. The adult persons represented by counsel at this time were the executors, as such, and the widow. Wilhelmina Schumacher, a legatee, does not appear to have been represented by attorney at any stage of the proceeding, or to have joined in the stipulation. The disbursements for the fees of the referee and the stenographer were large, and the contest was more lengthy than was probably anticipated at the time when the stipulation was made. In my opinion, as to the main questions in the case, I have stated that these disbursements, as a part of the costs, should be charged against the surviving executor. The stipulation as to disbursements had not been called to my attention, and this may require a modification of the ruling. The question whether Mr. Steencken, as legatee, is bound by the stipulation, or whether this stipulation is binding upon the court, so as to control my discretion as to costs, and to compel a further rebate of the legacy of Mr. Steencken, should also be reserved until his representative is before the court. No question as to costs will, therefore, be finally determined in the decree now about to be entered, but all of such questions will be reserved until Mr. Steencken’s representative is before the court.

Decreed accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Mills Surr. 106, 33 Misc. 672, 68 N.Y.S. 938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-judicial-settlement-of-the-accounts-of-the-surviving-of-koch-nysurct-1901.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack