In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Rowe
134 N.E. 569, 232 N.Y. 554, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 586
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Rowe, 134 N.E. 569, 232 N.Y. 554, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 586 (N.Y. 1921).
134 N.E. 569 (In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Rowe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jacobs v. Stark
83 Misc. 2d 605 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1975)
In re the Accounting of the Public Administrator
12 A.D.2d 811 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
In re the Estate of Nordhauser
197 Misc. 119 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1950)
In re the Accounting of Moors
196 Misc. 423 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1949)
In re the Accounting of Mulligan
196 Misc. 475 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1949)
Estate of Bloom
2 P.2d 753 (California Supreme Court, 1931)
Falk v. Empire State Degree of Honor
138 Misc. 697 (New York Supreme Court, 1930)
In re the Estate of Katz
135 Misc. 861 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1930)
Langrick v. Rowe
212 A.D. 404 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)
Bering v. United States Trust Co.
201 A.D. 35 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)
In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Rowe
134 N.E. 599 (New York Court of Appeals, 1922)
In Re the Judicial Settlement of Rowe
134 N.E. 586 (New York Court of Appeals, 1922)