In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Hale
This text of 232 A.D. 859 (In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Hale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion of appellants Baucus and others for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs to Herbert D. Hamm, Esq., attorney for respondent, and ten dollars costs to Charles Grosberg, Esq., special guardian, payable out of the estate. Motion of said appellants for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Motion of appellants Miller for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs to Herbert D. Hamm, Esq., attorney for respondent, and ten dollars costs to Charles Grosberg, Esq., special guardian, payable out of the estate. Motion of said appellants for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
232 A.D. 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-judicial-settlement-of-the-accounts-of-hale-nyappdiv-1931.