In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Armitage

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Armitage

254 A.D. 615, 4 N.Y.S.2d 383, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6746

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 23, 1938·Published

Opinion

Appeal from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Rensselaer county, made and entered on October 1, 1937, allowing a claim of $500 and interest filed by William H. Hull, a brother of decedent. The claim was based upon a promissory note executed and delivered by decedent to claimant sometime before Ms death. The representative of the estate set up the defenses of forgery and failure of consideration. Decree unanimously affirmed, with costs to all parties filing briefs, payable out of the estate. Present — Hill, P. J., MeNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Rensselaer county, made and entered on October 1, 1937, allowing a claim of $500 and interest filed by William H. Hull, a brother of decedent. The claim was based upon a promissory note executed and delivered by decedent to claimant sometime before Ms death. The representative of the estate set up the defenses of forgery and failure of consideration. Decree unanimously affirmed, with costs to all parties filing briefs, payable out of the estate. Present — Hill, P. J., MeNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Armitage, 254 A.D. 615, 4 N.Y.S.2d 383, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

254 A.D. 615 (In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Armitage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.