In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Amidon
135 A.D. 919
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1909
StatusPublished
This text of 135 A.D. 919 (In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Amidon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Amidon, 135 A.D. 919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Ingraham and Laughlin, jj., dissenting on the ground that under the answer of the executor the surrogate had no jurisdiction to determine the question presented.' (Fiester v. Shepard, 92 N. Y. 251; Matter of Wagner, 119 id. 28.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fiester v. . Shepard
92 N.Y. 251 (New York Court of Appeals, 1883)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
135 A.D. 919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-judicial-settlement-of-the-accounts-of-amidon-nyappdiv-1909.