In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Amidon
135 A.D. 919
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1909·Published
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Ingraham and Laughlin, jj., dissenting on the ground that under the answer of the executor the surrogate had no jurisdiction to determine the question presented.' (Fiester v. Shepard, 92 N. Y. 251; Matter of Wagner, 119 id. 28.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Amidon, 135 A.D. 919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).
135 A.D. 919 (In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Amidon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fiester v. . Shepard
92 N.Y. 251 (New York Court of Appeals, 1883)