In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Alstyne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Alstyne

143 A.D. 962, 128 N.Y.S. 486

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1911

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 143 A.D. 962 (In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Alstyne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Alstyne, 143 A.D. 962, 128 N.Y.S. 486 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for reargument.

Per Curiam:

The notice of appeal stated that the appellant intended to bring up the facts for review under section 2586 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This was notice to the respondent of the importance of settling into the case his objections and exceptions. Many of his objections and exceptions are so settled, [963]*963but it appears now from the affidavits that some important ones were omitted. A reargument, therefore, is made proper by this omission, and he asks to be relieved from the effect thereof. A reargument is granted upon condition that the respondent pay to the appellant all costs and disbursements made since the notice of appeal was served, with §150 in addition thereto. All concurred, except Houghton, J., dissenting as to the §150; Betts, J., not sitting. Reargument granted upon condition that the respondent pay to the appellant all costs and disbursements made since the notice of appeal was served, with §150 in addition thereto.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for reargument.

Per Curiam:

The notice of appeal stated that the appellant intended to bring up the facts for review under section 2586 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This was notice to the respondent of the importance of settling into the case his objections and exceptions. Many of his objections and exceptions are so settled, [963]*963but it appears now from the affidavits that some important ones were omitted. A reargument, therefore, is made proper by this omission, and he asks to be relieved from the effect thereof. A reargument is granted upon condition that the respondent pay to the appellant all costs and disbursements made since the notice of appeal was served, with §150 in addition thereto. All concurred, except Houghton, J., dissenting as to the §150; Betts, J., not sitting. Reargument granted upon condition that the respondent pay to the appellant all costs and disbursements made since the notice of appeal was served, with §150 in addition thereto.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 A.D. 962, 128 N.Y.S. 486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-judicial-settlement-of-the-accounts-of-alstyne-nyappdiv-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack