In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of White

252 A.D. 911

Opinion

Decision, handed down November 10, 1937 [ante, p. 896], and the order [912]*912entered thereon, are hereby amended to read as follows: “ Decree affirmed, with costs to the respondents, payable out of the estate. The decision is made upon the ground that delivery of the note was not established, and that the claim was not allowed by the deceased representative of the Houghtaling estate, and that the decree is not against the weight of the evidence. Rhodes, McNamee and Bliss, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents, with an opinion in which Heffernan, J., concurs.” Present — Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of White, 252 A.D. 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

252 A.D. 911 (In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.