In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of the Proceedings of Hall

217 A.D. 701
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1926·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The contract for compensation to the attorneys for the executor, as established at the hearing by proof, as to the competency of which no objection was made, was authorized by the residuary legatee. She was the only person to be adversely affected by such contract; she was, therefore, estopped from objecting thereto, and the estoppel, after her death, extended to her next of kin. The allowance to the attorney for the contestant, under the circumstances, we consider excessive. All concur. Decree reversed on the law and facts and new trial granted before the surrogate, with costs to the appellant payable out of the estate. Orders reversed on the law and facts, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of the Proceedings of Hall, 217 A.D. 701 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

217 A.D. 701 (In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of the Proceedings of Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Accounting of Marcy
187 Misc. 264 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1946)