In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Randall
This text of 202 A.D. 860 (In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Randall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Decree of surrogate modified as hereinafter indicated and as modified affirmed. The court disapproves of the refusal of the surrogate to find that the sum of $500 for attorney’s services in obtaining settlement was a proper deduction to be made from the fund recovered.v (Code Civ. Proc. § 1903.)
Amount received in settlement................................... $5,250 00
Deductions to be made before division:
Amount allowed to Leopold Spitz........................ $250 00
Funeral expenses, A. N. Henderson, Malone, N. Y......... 28 00
Henry J. Conley, undertaker........................... 238 00
Cemetery lot for interment of deceased in Malone, N. Y— 82 00
Monument for deceased............................... 145 00
Francis B. Cantwell, services in obtaining settlement of case. 500 00
Francis B. Cantwell, services on final accounting.......... 50 00
Expense of serving citations............................. 10 00
Amount of administratrix commissions................... 156 25
- 1,459 25
Those portions of the decree which order the account to be settled as stated in the third finding of the surrogate and which order the administratrix to reimburse the estate to the extent of $184.34 and all other portions of said decree inconsistent herewith are reversed Let an order be entered in accordance with this decision and also decreeing that the administratrix pay to J. C. Little, special guardian $50.50 the amount allowed by the surrogate upon the final account’ng and also decreeing that costs be payable to all parties filing separate briefs herein payable out of the estate and decreeing that the balance be distributed one-third to the widow and to each of the infants one-fourth of two-thirds. All concur; Van Kirk, J., not sitting.
Now Decedent Estate Law, § 133, as added by Laws of 1920, chap. 919.-— [Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 A.D. 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-judicial-settlement-of-the-account-of-randall-nyappdiv-1922.