In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Walsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Walsh

174 A.D. 895, 159 N.Y.S. 1148

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1916·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county modified by providing that such decree is without prejudice to bringing, in equity, a new suit which appellants may be advised to institute, wherein, by joinder of proper parties, the equitable ownership of the McDonough judgment may be finally determined, and as thus modified decree affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county modified by providing that such decree is without prejudice to bringing, in equity, a new suit which appellants may be advised to institute, wherein, by joinder of proper parties, the equitable ownership of the McDonough judgment may be finally determined, and as thus modified decree affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Walsh, 174 A.D. 895, 159 N.Y.S. 1148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

174 A.D. 895 (In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Walsh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related