In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Rosenberg

221 A.D. 762
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Rosenberg. Read the opinion of the Court — 213 A.D. 167

Opinion

Upon reargument, we adhere to our former decision in this case, which points out that the decision is without prejudice to an application under section 231-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act. The allowances made under sections 278 and 279 of the Surrogate’s Court Act are costs in the accounting proceeding. We do not now pass upon the power of the surrogate to grant allowances under section 231-a. Order signed. Present — Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Rosenberg, 221 A.D. 762 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

221 A.D. 762 (In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Rosenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.