In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Paschal

243 A.D. 627

This text of 243 A.D. 627 (In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Paschal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Paschal, 243 A.D. 627 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Rockland county, dated April 4, 1934, and the intermediate order of October 31, 1932, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the respondent’s petition to open the proceeding on the intermediate accounting of the executors denied, without costs. In our opinion, there was an abuse of discretion on the part of the learned surrogate in vacating the decree of July 15,1931, which settled the intermediate account of said executors and trustees, to which proceeding respondent was a party, and in which he appeared by an attorney. (Surr. Ct. Act, § 20, subd. 6.) The provisions of the decree of April 4, 1934, as to the amount of the net income from the residuary estate are without any sound basis in the record. The amount of the residuary estate cannot be determined until the sale of the real estate and the payment of general legacies, debts and expenses of administration. The surrogate was not authorized to allow the respondent’s claim against the estate for alleged services, "which was not presented to the executors until six months after their account had been filed, and which was rejected; respondent’s remedy, then, was by commencing an action within three months, or by reserving Ms claim for adjudication on the settlement of a subsequent accounting by the executors. TMs is, however, made unnecessary by the stipulation of the parties. The allowances to respondent’s counsel, for services rendered on Ms motion to open the original proceeding and to vacate the decree of July 15, 1931, and in the proceedings subsequent thereto, eventuating in the decree here under review, to be paid out of the estate, were improperly made. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and TompMns, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 A.D. 627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-judicial-settlement-of-the-account-of-proceedings-of-paschal-nyappdiv-1935.