In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Heintz
This text of 246 A.D. 528 (In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Heintz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion of Charles P. Heintz to modify order of the Surrogate’s Court, New York county, dated June 17, 1935, directing his examination as an accounting executor, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Townley, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D. 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-judicial-settlement-of-the-account-of-proceedings-of-heintz-nyappdiv-1935.