In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Bankers Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Bankers Trust Co.

257 A.D. 1031, 13 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8962

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 28, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D. 1031 (In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Bankers Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Bankers Trust Co., 257 A.D. 1031, 13 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8962 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Decree so far as appealed from affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Claims of this land are rightfully subjected to the closest scrutiny. (Rosseau v. Rouss, 180 N. Y. 116; Roberge v. Bonner, 94 App. Div. 342; affd., 185 N. Y. 265.) However, see Matter of Stein (214 App. Div. 752; affd., 241 N. Y. 529). There is evidence to support findings that decedent’s personal charity organization, “ Friendly Fund, Inc.,” paid the claimant for the actual medical treatments which he gave to decedent’s charity patients, and that decedent bound himself personally to pay claimant SI ,500 a year for general oversight of decedent’s charities, and that claimant did work beyond that for which he was paid by “ Friendly Fund, Inc.” All concur. (The portion of the decree appealed from allows a claim against the estate for services performed.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decree so far as appealed from affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Claims of this land are rightfully subjected to the closest scrutiny. (Rosseau v. Rouss, 180 N. Y. 116; Roberge v. Bonner, 94 App. Div. 342; affd., 185 N. Y. 265.) However, see Matter of Stein (214 App. Div. 752; affd., 241 N. Y. 529). There is evidence to support findings that decedent’s personal charity organization, “ Friendly Fund, Inc.,” paid the claimant for the actual medical treatments which he gave to decedent’s charity patients, and that decedent bound himself personally to pay claimant SI ,500 a year for general oversight of decedent’s charities, and that claimant did work beyond that for which he was paid by “ Friendly Fund, Inc.” All concur. (The portion of the decree appealed from allows a claim against the estate for services performed.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Dowling, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D. 1031, 13 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8962, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-judicial-settlement-of-the-account-of-proceedings-of-bankers-nyappdiv-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack