In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Klenk
This text of 165 A.D. 917 (In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Klenk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The husband and wife became joint tenants of the $14,000 deposited (Kelly v. Beers, 194 N. Y. 49; Matter of Meehan, 59 App. Div. 156; Platt v. Grubb, 41 Hun, 447; Matter of Kaupper, 141 App. Div. 54; Kelly v. Home Savings Bank, 103 id. 141; Sanford v. Sanford, 45 N. Y. 723; McElroy v. Albany Savings Bank, 8 App. Div. 46), and the husband was not ousted from such tenancy by her withdrawal of the money and by the deposit of it elsewhere, or by loaning a part of it and receiving a note therefor. (O'Connor v. Dunnigan, 158 App. Div. 334.) The decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county should be reversed, without costs, and the matter remitted to the surrogate to proceed in accordance with this opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to said court to proceed in accordance with opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 A.D. 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-judicial-settlement-of-the-account-of-klenk-nyappdiv-1914.