In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Kahan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Kahan

244 A.D. 282, 279 N.Y.S. 365, 1935 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5808

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 3, 1935

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 244 A.D. 282 (In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Kahan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Kahan, 244 A.D. 282, 279 N.Y.S. 365, 1935 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5808 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The executor was not entitled to collect the rents of real property devised to the appellant, the residuary legatee, except to the extent necessary to pay the debts of the estate. Accordingly, the executor was entitled to commissions only upon rentals collected for the month of April, 1932, in addition to the commissions properly allowed upon the personal property belonging to the estate. The decree appealed from should be modified accordingly, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.

Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.

Decree modified as indicated in opinion and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The executor was not entitled to collect the rents of real property devised to the appellant, the residuary legatee, except to the extent necessary to pay the debts of the estate. Accordingly, the executor was entitled to commissions only upon rentals collected for the month of April, 1932, in addition to the commissions properly allowed upon the personal property belonging to the estate. The decree appealed from should be modified accordingly, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.

Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.

Decree modified as indicated in opinion and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 A.D. 282, 279 N.Y.S. 365, 1935 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-judicial-settlement-of-the-account-of-kahan-nyappdiv-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack