In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Hanley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Hanley

243 A.D. 858

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 858 (In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Hanley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Hanley, 243 A.D. 858 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Decree reversed on the law in so far as it dismisses objections numbered 2 and 3 and passes the administratrix’s accounts in respect to the articles referred to in such objections and [859]*859matter remitted to the Surrogate’s Court to proceed to hear and determine such objections, and decree otherwise affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The account in Schedule A shows certain chattels in the hands of the administratrix which are not disposed of. The decree apparently overlooks these articles. We are, therefore, remitting the proceeding to the surrogate so that the omission may be properly supplied. All concur. (The decree dismissed objections to the account of the administratrix.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decree reversed on the law in so far as it dismisses objections numbered 2 and 3 and passes the administratrix’s accounts in respect to the articles referred to in such objections and [859]*859matter remitted to the Surrogate’s Court to proceed to hear and determine such objections, and decree otherwise affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The account in Schedule A shows certain chattels in the hands of the administratrix which are not disposed of. The decree apparently overlooks these articles. We are, therefore, remitting the proceeding to the surrogate so that the omission may be properly supplied. All concur. (The decree dismissed objections to the account of the administratrix.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-judicial-settlement-of-the-account-of-hanley-nyappdiv-1935.