In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Fuehrer

New York Surrogate's Court

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Fuehrer

9 Mills Surr. 95, 75 Misc. 596, 136 N.Y.S. 173

New York Surrogate's Court·Decided February 15, 1912·Published

Opinion

Ketcham, S.

The account should be settled as made. It is correct in charging upon the income the disbursements for taxes, insurance and such repairs as are not shown to be in the nature of permanent improvements. Matter of Albertson, 113 N. Y. 434; Stevens v. Melcher, 152 id. 551, and cases cited; Matter of Very, 24 Misc. Rep. 139.

The case of Kirchner v. Kirchner, 71 Misc. Rep. 61, while it correctly reproduces the effect of these authorities with respect to permanent improvements, is arrayed against the authorities in its declaration that the expenditures for insurance are to be apportioned between principal and income.

Decreed accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ketcham, S.

The account should be settled as made. It is correct in charging upon the income the disbursements for taxes, insurance and such repairs as are not shown to be in the nature of permanent improvements. Matter of Albertson, 113 N. Y. 434; Stevens v. Melcher, 152 id. 551, and cases cited; Matter of Very, 24 Misc. Rep. 139.

The case of Kirchner v. Kirchner, 71 Misc. Rep. 61, while it correctly reproduces the effect of these authorities with respect to permanent improvements, is arrayed against the authorities in its declaration that the expenditures for insurance are to be apportioned between principal and income.

Decreed accordingly.

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Fuehrer, 9 Mills Surr. 95, 75 Misc. 596, 136 N.Y.S. 173 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1912).

Pincite

9 Mills Surr. 95 (In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Fuehrer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related