In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Bigley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Bigley

248 A.D. 820, 290 N.Y.S. 749, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7497

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 820 (In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Bigley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Bigley, 248 A.D. 820, 290 N.Y.S. 749, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7497 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding for the judicial settlement of the account of the executors of the last will and testament of Joseph A. Bigley, deceased, decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county in so far as it adjudges (a) that Catherine Bigley, surviving spouse of the testator, had a right to elect under section 18 of the Decedent Estate Law, (b) that her election pursuant thereto is valid, (e) that she be allowed $300, pursuant to Surrogate’s Court Act, section 200, subdivision 4, and (d) that she, as the surviving spouse of the deceased, be paid the sum of $579.69 as her intestate share of his estate, unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent, payable out of the estate. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding for the judicial settlement of the account of the executors of the last will and testament of Joseph A. Bigley, deceased, decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county in so far as it adjudges (a) that Catherine Bigley, surviving spouse of the testator, had a right to elect under section 18 of the Decedent Estate Law, (b) that her election pursuant thereto is valid, (e) that she be allowed $300, pursuant to Surrogate’s Court Act, section 200, subdivision 4, and (d) that she, as the surviving spouse of the deceased, be paid the sum of $579.69 as her intestate share of his estate, unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent, payable out of the estate. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 820, 290 N.Y.S. 749, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-judicial-settlement-of-the-account-of-bigley-nyappdiv-1936.