In re the Judicial Settlement of Estate of Hughes
This text of 230 A.D. 776 (In re the Judicial Settlement of Estate of Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Decree reversed on the facts and matter remitted to the Surrogate’s Court, with directions to enter a decree allowing the claim, on the ground that the evidence establishes that the services performed by the claimant were performed under a contract with the testator as alleged in the claimant’s claim, and that the finding of the surrogate to the contrary is against the weight of the evidence. All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Edgcomb, J., who dissent and vote for affirmance on the opinion of Bird, S. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Thompson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 A.D. 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-judicial-settlement-of-estate-of-hughes-nyappdiv-1930.