In re the Judicial Settlement of Account of Proceedings of Olvany

236 A.D. 805

This text of 236 A.D. 805 (In re the Judicial Settlement of Account of Proceedings of Olvany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Judicial Settlement of Account of Proceedings of Olvany, 236 A.D. 805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Nassau county reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellants, payable out of the estate, and motion denied, on the authority of Matter of Brennan (251 N. Y. 39); Matter of Starbuck (221 App. Div. 702; affd., 248 N. Y. 555). The power of the surrogate to vacate the decree is limited by subdivision 6 of section 20 of the Surrogate’s Court Act. The surrogate has no power to vacate a decree entered on default in order to determine whether judicial error has been committed. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Accounting of Clare
166 N.E. 797 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)
Matter of Starbuck
162 N.E. 522 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)
In re Starbuck
221 A.D. 702 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 A.D. 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-judicial-settlement-of-account-of-proceedings-of-olvany-nyappdiv-1932.