In re the Judicial Review of the Termination of Perry

Cherokee Nation Judicial Appeals Tribunal

In re the Judicial Review of the Termination of Perry

5 Am. Tribal Law 1

CourtCherokee Nation Judicial Appeals Tribunal

DecidedJanuary 7, 2004

DocketJAT-01-07

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Am. Tribal Law 1 (In re the Judicial Review of the Termination of Perry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Cherokee Nation Judicial Appeals Tribunal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Judicial Review of the Termination of Perry, 5 Am. Tribal Law 1 (cherokeeapp 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

STACY L. LEEDS, Justice.

On January 2,2004, the parties, by and through their attorneys, Nason Morton for the Petitioner Perry and Becky Johnson for the Respondent Cherokee Nation, appeared for a status conference. At the conference, attorneys agreed that the only remedy sought of this Court was the award of back pay to the Petitioner.

The Court advised the parties that this Court has established a line of cases prohibiting the award back pay in employee appeals cases. See Bush, JAT-O1-09 (April 2002); See also Cain, JAT-01-16 (Oct. 2002). Consistent with this line of cases, this Court lacks the statutory authority to grant the sole remedy sought by Petitioner in this matter.

Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss dated August 13, 2002, is hereby granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

STACY L. LEEDS, Justice.

On January 2,2004, the parties, by and through their attorneys, Nason Morton for the Petitioner Perry and Becky Johnson for the Respondent Cherokee Nation, appeared for a status conference. At the conference, attorneys agreed that the only remedy sought of this Court was the award of back pay to the Petitioner.

The Court advised the parties that this Court has established a line of cases prohibiting the award back pay in employee appeals cases. See Bush, JAT-O1-09 (April 2002); See also Cain, JAT-01-16 (Oct. 2002). Consistent with this line of cases, this Court lacks the statutory authority to grant the sole remedy sought by Petitioner in this matter.

Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss dated August 13, 2002, is hereby granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Am. Tribal Law 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-judicial-review-of-the-termination-of-perry-cherokeeapp-2004.