In re the Judicial Accounting of Westerbeke
236 A.D. 856
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1932·Published
Opinion
Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Suffolk county, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with costs to respondents, payable out of the estate. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Davis, J., dissents and votes to reverse on the ground that the language of the will is not sufficiently specific to exclude the. statutory allowance, which was not a part of-the assets of the estate, under- section 200 of the Surrogage’s Court Act. [143 Misc. 221.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Judicial Accounting of Westerbeke, 236 A.D. 856 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
236 A.D. 856 (In re the Judicial Accounting of Westerbeke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Westerbeke
143 Misc. 221 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1932)