In re the Judicial Accounting of Westerbeke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Judicial Accounting of Westerbeke

236 A.D. 856

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 236 A.D. 856 (In re the Judicial Accounting of Westerbeke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Judicial Accounting of Westerbeke, 236 A.D. 856 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Suffolk county, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with costs to respondents, payable out of the estate. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Davis, J., dissents and votes to reverse on the ground that the language of the will is not sufficiently specific to exclude the. statutory allowance, which was not a part of-the assets of the estate, under- section 200 of the Surrogage’s Court Act. [143 Misc. 221.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Suffolk county, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with costs to respondents, payable out of the estate. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Davis, J., dissents and votes to reverse on the ground that the language of the will is not sufficiently specific to exclude the. statutory allowance, which was not a part of-the assets of the estate, under- section 200 of the Surrogage’s Court Act. [143 Misc. 221.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 A.D. 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-judicial-accounting-of-westerbeke-nyappdiv-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack