In re the Judicial Accounting of Webb

194 A.D. 915
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1920·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Suffolk county modified by reversing the award of costs against the objecting party, and as so modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal. On the record before this court there is no evidence of bad faith in filing objections to the substantial depreciation claimed by the accounting trustee. The appellant was a party interested in the estate, and was within his rights in filing the objections, without reference to the amount of his interest or its contingent character. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Judicial Accounting of Webb, 194 A.D. 915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).

194 A.D. 915 (In re the Judicial Accounting of Webb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Epstein
277 A.D.2d 452 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re the Estate of Shapiro
41 Misc. 2d 195 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1963)
City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Bennett
159 Misc. 779 (New York Supreme Court, 1936)