In re the Internal Operating Rules of the Montana Supreme Court

229 Mont. 1
Montana Supreme Court·Decided December 17, 1987·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

This Court has reviewed its internal operating rules and concluded it is appropriate to revise the rules to improve the opinions of the Court and with the hope of reducing the time required for opinions. The Court has discussed the “1988 Internal Operating Rules” and concluded it will operate under such rules until the further order of this Court.

The provisions of the Constitution of the State of Montana grant to this Court the power to make rules governing the conduct of the Court and of its members, without approval of other branches of government or of the organized bar.

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) The attached “1988 Internal Operating Rules” are hereby adopted commencing January 4, 1988, and to remain in effect until the further order of this Court.

(2) The “1988 Internal Operating Rules” shall be delivered to the State Bar of Montana for publication in The Montana Lawyer, and to the State Reporter and West Publishing Company with the request that they consider the same for publication.

s/J.A. Turnage, Chief Justice

s/John Conway Harrison, Justice

s/Fred J. Weber, Justice

s/R.C. McDonough, Justice

s/William E. Hunt, Justice

s/L.C. Gulbrandson, Justice

MONTANA SUPREME COURT 1988 INTERNAL OPERATING RULES

SECTION I. CLASSIFICATION AND CONSIDERATION FOR SUMMARY DISPOSITION, REBRIEFING AND SUBMISSION ON BRIEFS

1. Upon receipt of appellant’s reply brief, or after the time for filing the same has expired, the office of the Clerk of Court shall [2]*2promptly deliver copies of the briefs to all justices and to the Chief Justice all district court files. All documents subsequently received pertaining to such cases shall be promptly delivered to the Chief Justice.

2. The Chief Justice then shall assign each case to a panel of five justices and place each case on a conference agenda at least one week later.

3. On the conference date the following procedure will be used in considering the cases set for conference:

(a) Each case will be discussed by the 5 justices assigned to that case. The first issue shall be oral argument. If two justices request oral argument, the case will be set for oral argument en banc, and no further discussion will be held on that case.

(b) If an appeal is deemed frivolous, it will be summarily dismissed. If a case is found to be insufficiently briefed, it will be returned to counsel for such rebriefing as is required.

(c) If the case is classed as submitted on briefs, the 5 justices on the panel will discuss the merits of the case and take a tentative vote. If 4 or more justices reach a conclusion, the case then will be assigned by the Chief Justice to one of the 5 justices on the panel for opinion writing, and that date will be the submission date for that case. If 4 justices do not vote for one position, the case will be assigned for en banc consideration at the conference one week later.

(d) Appropriate orders shall advise counsel of summary disposition, rebriefing requirements, and submission on briefs assignment.

(e) Cases classified for oral argument shall be placed on the calendar. An appropriate order shall promptly give notice of the time set for hearing oral argument.

SECTION II. ORAL ARGUMENT

1. Where an appeal is calendared for oral argument, the Chief Justice shall designate a justice to author a bench memorandum. The bench memorandum shall be completed in sufficient time for distribution at least one week prior to oral argument.

2. The bench memorandum shall contain these elements:

(a) A brief orientation paragraph.

(b) A statement of the issues with references to the pages on the various briefs on which the issues are treated.

(c) The pertinent facts.

(d) The procedure followed.

(e) Discussion of issues in the order contained in the briefs, setting [3]*3out the appellant’s contentions, the respondent’s contentions and a discussion on each issue with page references to briefs.

(f) Any conclusion and recommendations.

(g) The memorandum is for reference purposes and shall be as brief as possible.

3. The justice preparing the bench memorandum may request a pre-argument conference to be held prior to oral argument. At that conference a discussion may be held upon issues, questions, and clarifications required.

4. A conference will be held following oral argument. The justice who prepared the bench memorandum will present his analysis of the issues and give his recommendation. The balance of the court will then vote on the case. The date of oral argument will be the submission date.

5. Oral argument cases on which a vote has not yet been taken will receive first priority at all Court conferences. A judge absent at a subsequent conference will be responsible for presenting his views in writing in time for conference.

6. When four justices have reached a tentative decision on a case, that case then will be assigned for opinion writing by the Chief Justice. The result is that the bench memorandum writing justice may not be the author of the opinion.

SECTION III. OPINIONS

1. The basic aim is that the final opinion in each case shall be signed and filed with the Clerk of Court not later than 120 days following the submission date.

2. Within the foregoing period of 120 days, the following applies:

(a) Within 30 days of the submission date, the opinion-writing justice shall circulate an opinion draft. That draft shall be considered at the next Thursday conference, subject to the requirement that the opinion must be circulated by Monday in order to be considered on Thursday.

(b) At the conference the opinion draft shall be voted upon. If four justices vote in favor, the draft shall be finalized.

(c) A justice shall circulate copies of his signed dissenting or concurring opinion within 10 days of the date on which a majority approve a proposed opinion.

(d) Nothing contained in these time periods shall prevent a justice from filing a dissent or special concurring opinion after the 120 day [4]*4time limit or after the filing of the majority opinion with the Clerk of Court.

4. If the dissent or special concurring opinion is not signed within 10 days of the date on which the majority opinion was approved in Court conference, then the majority opinion shall be filed with the Clerk of Court without prejudice to the later filing of a dissenting or concurring opinion.

SECTION IV. OPERATION AS SEVEN JUSTICE AND FIVE JUSTICE COURT

1. The Supreme Court en banc shall consist of seven members. The Court en banc shall hear all cases in which the accused shall have been sentenced to death, cases in which a bona fide challenge is made to the constitutionality of a statute, and such cases as shall be determined by two or more justices to require a hearing en banc.

2. Any petition for rehearing shall be considered by those justices hearing the case in the first instance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Internal Operating Rules of the Montana Supreme Court, 229 Mont. 1 (Mo. 1987).

229 Mont. 1 (In re the Internal Operating Rules of the Montana Supreme Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Neil
2009 MT 128 (Montana Supreme Court, 2009)