In re the Intermediate Accounting of Mack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Intermediate Accounting of Mack

245 A.D. 42, 280 N.Y.S. 456, 1935 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10215

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 28, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 245 A.D. 42 (In re the Intermediate Accounting of Mack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Intermediate Accounting of Mack, 245 A.D. 42, 280 N.Y.S. 456, 1935 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10215 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The allowance of two and one-half per cent commissions upon the $812.92 received by the committee from his immediate predecessor cannot be allowed, for “ no compensation shall be allowed on the corpus of an estate received from a preceding guardian.” (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1384-k.) This statute is controlling. (Matter of Barker, 230 N. Y. 364, 372; Whitehead v. Draper, 132 App. Div. 799.) The committee is not chargeable with interest on commissions deducted by him in 1932, 1933 and 1934. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1376, as amd. by Laws of 1930, chap. 209.) The order appealed from is erroneous in that there should be deducted from the amount allowed to the committee the sum of twenty dollars and thirty-two cents commissions allowed upon the corpus received from the former committee.

All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Lewis, JJ.

Order, so far as appealed from, reversed on the law, without costs, and item of twenty dollars and thirty-two cents struck out of the order, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The allowance of two and one-half per cent commissions upon the $812.92 received by the committee from his immediate predecessor cannot be allowed, for “ no compensation shall be allowed on the corpus of an estate received from a preceding guardian.” (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1384-k.) This statute is controlling. (Matter of Barker, 230 N. Y. 364, 372; Whitehead v. Draper, 132 App. Div. 799.) The committee is not chargeable with interest on commissions deducted by him in 1932, 1933 and 1934. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1376, as amd. by Laws of 1930, chap. 209.) The order appealed from is erroneous in that there should be deducted from the amount allowed to the committee the sum of twenty dollars and thirty-two cents commissions allowed upon the corpus received from the former committee.

All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Lewis, JJ.

Order, so far as appealed from, reversed on the law, without costs, and item of twenty dollars and thirty-two cents struck out of the order, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 A.D. 42, 280 N.Y.S. 456, 1935 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-intermediate-accounting-of-mack-nyappdiv-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack