In re the Intermediate Accounting of Mack

245 A.D. 42, 280 N.Y.S. 456, 1935 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10215

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The allowance of two and one-half per cent commissions upon the $812.92 received by the committee from his immediate predecessor cannot be allowed, for “ no compensation shall be allowed on the corpus of an estate received from a preceding guardian.” (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1384-k.) This statute is controlling. (Matter of Barker, 230 N. Y. 364, 372; Whitehead v. Draper, 132 App. Div. 799.) The committee is not chargeable with interest on commissions deducted by him in 1932, 1933 and 1934. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1376, as amd. by Laws of 1930, chap. 209.) The order appealed from is erroneous in that there should be deducted from the amount allowed to the committee the sum of twenty dollars and thirty-two cents commissions allowed upon the corpus received from the former committee.

All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Lewis, JJ.

Order, so far as appealed from, reversed on the law, without costs, and item of twenty dollars and thirty-two cents struck out of the order, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Intermediate Accounting of Mack, 245 A.D. 42, 280 N.Y.S. 456, 1935 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10215 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

245 A.D. 42 (In re the Intermediate Accounting of Mack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re the Accounting of Barker
130 N.E. 579 (New York Court of Appeals, 1921)
Whitehead v. Draper
132 A.D. 799 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)