In re The Hub

275 F. 400
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Florida
DecidedJune 15, 1921
StatusPublished

This text of 275 F. 400 (In re The Hub) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re The Hub, 275 F. 400 (S.D. Fla. 1921).

Opinion

CAFF, District Judge.

This application is made under section 69 of the Bankruptcy Act (Comp. St. § 9653), which provides:

“A judge may, upon satisfactory proof, by affidavit, that a bankrupt against whom an involuntary petition has been filed and is pending has committed an act of bankruptcy, * * * issue a warrant to the marshal to seize and hold it subject to further orders.”

In this matter the only affidavit submitted with the application is made by one of the attorneys of the petitioning creditors as to statements made to him by certain parties. These statements, except such as were made by the bankrupts, are hearsay and without probative value. In re Kelly (D. C. Tenn.) 91 Fed. 504, 1 Am. Bankr. Rep. 306. The statute requires at least a prima facie case to be made by the applicants. This has not been done in this case, in the face of the answer denying the acts of bankruptcy alleged in the petition, and therefore the application will be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Kelly
91 F. 504 (W.D. Tennessee, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 F. 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-hub-flsd-1921.