in Re the Houston Exploration Company, Relator
This text of in Re the Houston Exploration Company, Relator (in Re the Houston Exploration Company, Relator) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-10-00503-CV
IN RE THE HOUSTON EXPLORATION CO.
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 15, 2010
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On June 7, 2010, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered
relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and the response of the real party in interest and is of the
opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of
mandamus is DENIED. See TEX . R. APP . P. 52.8(a).
1 … This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 6,252, styled April S. Trump Ordiway, Individually and on behalf of the Estate of Kevin D. Ordiway Jr. and on behalf of McKenzee D. Ordiway, a child of Kevin D. Ordiway, Jr. v. The Houston Exploration Co., in the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas, the Honorable Jose Antonio Lopez presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re the Houston Exploration Company, Relator, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-houston-exploration-company-relator-texapp-2010.