In re the Habeas Corpus of Morgan

1955 OK CR 78, 285 P.2d 452, 1955 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 230
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJune 15, 1955
DocketNo. A-12198
StatusPublished

This text of 1955 OK CR 78 (In re the Habeas Corpus of Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Habeas Corpus of Morgan, 1955 OK CR 78, 285 P.2d 452, 1955 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 230 (Okla. Ct. App. 1955).

Opinion

JONES, Presiding Judge.

This is an original action in. habeas corpus instituted by Ray Morgan for the purpose of securing his release from confinement in the State Penitentiary.

The sole contention of petitioner is that he was sentenced to serve a term of 10 years imprisonment in the penitentiary after pleading guilty to a charge of forgery after former- conviction of a felony when he was not informed that the information charged a former conviction. That petitioner alleged he thought at the time he entered his plea of guilty that the maximum term he would receive would be 7 years -imprisonment in the penitentiary. Attached to the petition is a photostatic copy of the information and a photostatic copy of the judgment and sentence on plea of guilty. The information was filed -against the accused on November 9, 1951, in the District Court of Seminole County. On the 29th day of January, 1952, the petitioner entered his plea of guilty to the information and was sentenced to serve the minimum term of 10 years imprisonment in the State .Penitentiary,, said , sentence to . run concurrently with a 2-year sentence pronounced in case No. 6558.

The information plainly charges the crime of forgery of a $95 check" on July 14, 1951, after a former conviction of forgery on July 3, 1930.’ ’

The sentence meted out to the petitioner was the minimum which he could have-received-on a plea of guilty based on the information filed against him. 21 O.S.1951 § 51, subd. 1.’

The proceedings are regular in every respect, the court had jurisdiction of the subject matter, of the person of the-accused and jurisdiction to render the particular judgment. The writ .of habeas corpus is denied. Ex parte Wallace, 81 Okl.Cr. 176, 162 P.2d 205.

-BRETT and POWELL, JJ.,-concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Wallace
1945 OK CR 92 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1955 OK CR 78, 285 P.2d 452, 1955 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-habeas-corpus-of-morgan-oklacrimapp-1955.