In re the Habeas Corpus of Hill

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

In re the Habeas Corpus of Hill

1954 OK CR 114, 272 P.2d 369, 1954 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 151

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 29, 1954

DocketNo. A-12126

StatusPublished

This text of 1954 OK CR 114 (In re the Habeas Corpus of Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Habeas Corpus of Hill, 1954 OK CR 114, 272 P.2d 369, 1954 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 151 (Okla. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

POWELL, Presiding Judge.

Ruben Hill filed a verified petition for a writ of habeas corpus to be admitted to bail upon a charge of murder, which was pending against him in the district court of Creek County, Oklahoma.

At the hearing before this court on September 20, 1954, the case was submitted upon the transcript of the testimony of witnesses who testified at the preliminary hearing, including the testimony of the defendant, together with an affidavit of one Lance Harrison, witness to the fatal difficulty between the defendant and Wince Nunn, Jr., now deceased.

Of course at a preliminary the State in order to be entitled to have an accused bound over to answer the charge, is required only to produce sufficient evidence to show probable cause. It is -not necessary that the evidence upon which the defendant is held to answer for trial be sufficient to support a conviction. It is sufficient if it is shown that a felony was committed, and that there is probable cause to believe the defendant guilty thereof. Tit. 22 O.S.1951 § 264; Ex parte Roberts, 31 Okl.Cr. 314, 238 P. 867.

We do not know what the evidence may be on trial, but in a long line of cases this court has held that the right to bail in a capital case is absolute unless the proof is evident or the presumption great that the defendant is guilty as charged, and that in case of a conviction he would probably receive a life sentence or death. Ex parte Spears, 85 Okl.Cr. 101, 185 P.2d 479; Wilson v. State, 92 Okl.Cr. 388, 223 P.2d 561.

After studying the transcript and affidavit submitted, this court being satisfied that petitioner had made a showing that was sufficient to entitle him to be admitted to bail, entered an order directing that petitioner be admitted to bail in the reasonable sum of $20,000, conditioned as required by law and to be approved by the court clerk of Creek County. This formal opinion is filed in conformity with that order.

JONES and BRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

POWELL, Presiding Judge.

Ruben Hill filed a verified petition for a writ of habeas corpus to be admitted to bail upon a charge of murder, which was pending against him in the district court of Creek County, Oklahoma.

At the hearing before this court on September 20, 1954, the case was submitted upon the transcript of the testimony of witnesses who testified at the preliminary hearing, including the testimony of the defendant, together with an affidavit of one Lance Harrison, witness to the fatal difficulty between the defendant and Wince Nunn, Jr., now deceased.

Of course at a preliminary the State in order to be entitled to have an accused bound over to answer the charge, is required only to produce sufficient evidence to show probable cause. It is -not necessary that the evidence upon which the defendant is held to answer for trial be sufficient to support a conviction. It is sufficient if it is shown that a felony was committed, and that there is probable cause to believe the defendant guilty thereof. Tit. 22 O.S.1951 § 264; Ex parte Roberts, 31 Okl.Cr. 314, 238 P. 867.

We do not know what the evidence may be on trial, but in a long line of cases this court has held that the right to bail in a capital case is absolute unless the proof is evident or the presumption great that the defendant is guilty as charged, and that in case of a conviction he would probably receive a life sentence or death. Ex parte Spears, 85 Okl.Cr. 101, 185 P.2d 479; Wilson v. State, 92 Okl.Cr. 388, 223 P.2d 561.

After studying the transcript and affidavit submitted, this court being satisfied that petitioner had made a showing that was sufficient to entitle him to be admitted to bail, entered an order directing that petitioner be admitted to bail in the reasonable sum of $20,000, conditioned as required by law and to be approved by the court clerk of Creek County. This formal opinion is filed in conformity with that order.

JONES and BRETT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1954 OK CR 114, 272 P.2d 369, 1954 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-habeas-corpus-of-hill-oklacrimapp-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack