In re the habeas corpus Harge

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

In re the habeas corpus Harge

1965 OK CR 107, 406 P.2d 3, 1965 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 267

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 13, 1965

DocketNo. 13772

StatusPublished

This text of 1965 OK CR 107 (In re the habeas corpus Harge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the habeas corpus Harge, 1965 OK CR 107, 406 P.2d 3, 1965 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 267 (Okla. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge.

This is an original proceeding instituted by Leon Harge seeking his release from confinement in the county jail of Oklahoma County and dismissal of the charges pending against him in District Court Case No. 30971.

A response was duly filed and this matter was set for oral argument on the 8th day of September, 1965, and submitted on stipulation of the parties and arguments of counsel, and the Court having considered the stipulation of the parties and arguments of counsel, and being fully advised in the premises is of the opinion that the writ prayed for should be, and the same is hereby denied, and the application for habeas corpus is accordingly dismissed.

Writ denied. Application for habeas corpus dismissed.

BRETT, J., concurs. NIX, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge.

This is an original proceeding instituted by Leon Harge seeking his release from confinement in the county jail of Oklahoma County and dismissal of the charges pending against him in District Court Case No. 30971.

A response was duly filed and this matter was set for oral argument on the 8th day of September, 1965, and submitted on stipulation of the parties and arguments of counsel, and the Court having considered the stipulation of the parties and arguments of counsel, and being fully advised in the premises is of the opinion that the writ prayed for should be, and the same is hereby denied, and the application for habeas corpus is accordingly dismissed.

Writ denied. Application for habeas corpus dismissed.

BRETT, J., concurs. NIX, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1965 OK CR 107, 406 P.2d 3, 1965 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-habeas-corpus-harge-oklacrimapp-1965.