In re the Guardianship of Heins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Guardianship of Heins

166 A.D. 897, 150 N.Y.S. 1089

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 166 A.D. 897 (In re the Guardianship of Heins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Guardianship of Heins, 166 A.D. 897, 150 N.Y.S. 1089 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Westchester county modified so as to provide that, beginning January first, the trustees shall pay to the general guardian, in the manner directed by the order, the sum of $300 per month, and the guardian shall render a detailed account to the surrogate up to the 1st of May, 1915, as soon thereafter as the account may be prepared, to the end that the surrogate may at that time scrutinize the items of disbursements, and determine whether the allowance should be still further reduced, or whether the necessities of the children require an increase thereof; and the order as so modified is affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Westchester county modified so as to provide that, beginning January first, the trustees shall pay to the general guardian, in the manner directed by the order, the sum of $300 per month, and the guardian shall render a detailed account to the surrogate up to the 1st of May, 1915, as soon thereafter as the account may be prepared, to the end that the surrogate may at that time scrutinize the items of disbursements, and determine whether the allowance should be still further reduced, or whether the necessities of the children require an increase thereof; and the order as so modified is affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 A.D. 897, 150 N.Y.S. 1089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-guardianship-of-heins-nyappdiv-1914.