In re the Guardianship of Farrell

New York Surrogate's Court

In re the Guardianship of Farrell

123 Misc. 113, 205 N.Y.S. 364, 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 944

CourtNew York Surrogate's Court

DecidedApril 30, 1924

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 123 Misc. 113 (In re the Guardianship of Farrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Guardianship of Farrell, 123 Misc. 113, 205 N.Y.S. 364, 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 944 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Schulz, S.

This is an application by a guardian of an infant for an allowance out of his estate for his support and maintenance.

The guardian, a maternal aunt of ■ the infant, was appointed after a spirited contest between her and the paternal grandmother, charges being made by each side that the interest manifested by the other was due to the property which the infant had or would receive. At that time the present guardian agreed that if appointed, she would support the infant and that no part of the infant’s property would be used for his support and education. A provision to that effect was incorporated in the decree with the qualification, however, that if it became necessary to apply any part thereof for such purposes, an order of the surrogate should be applied for, upon notice to such persons, if any, as he might direct. Upon this application, the surrogate directed that notice be given to the paternal grandmother and she opposes the application. It is set forth in the moving papers that since her appointment as' guardian the petitioner and her husband have adopted the infant.

There was precedent for attaching conditions to the appointment of the guardian. Derickson v. Derickson, 4 Dem. 295; Matter of Wagner, 75 Misc. Rep. 419; Matter of Mancini, 89 id. 83; Matter of Lamb’s Estate, 139 N. Y. Supp. 685; Matter of Cross, 92 Misc. Rep. 89; affd., 174 App. Div. 872. Under the circumstances, the duty of supporting and maintaining the infant rests upon the foster father by reason of the adoption, and in the event of his inability, upon the guardian, owing to the facts above stated. If it is shown, however, that the circumstances of the foster father and guardian are now such that they cannot perform that duty or that special expenses have been incurred which were necessary for the welfare of the infant and which they cannot pay, then the infant should not suffer for that reason and an .allowance should be made.

Among the items making up the amount asked for are some for medical attendance and medicines, expenses somewhat out of the ordinary, and also one for the premium on the guardian’s bond aggregating $105. This amount together with the sum of $25 costs will be allowed to the guardian. If at any time the foster father and the guardian deem it advisable that special advantages be given to the infant which they believe warranted by reason of the income which he has, and which they are unable to defray, or if the infant is in need of medical attention or the financial condition of the foster father and guardian becomes such that they cannot perform the duty imposed upon them, the court will entertain an application for an allowance. The foster parents and guardian are charged with the duty of seeing that the best interests of the infant are at all times subserved.

[115]*115Upon a prior application, an allowance of $100 was made to the guardian upon which no order was ever entered and which application it was stated the guardian now desires to withdraw. An order may, therefore, be entered upon this application allowing the guardian the sum of $105 and the sum of $25 costs and permitting a withdrawal of the application heretofore made.

Decreed accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schulz, S.

This is an application by a guardian of an infant for an allowance out of his estate for his support and maintenance.

The guardian, a maternal aunt of ■ the infant, was appointed after a spirited contest between her and the paternal grandmother, charges being made by each side that the interest manifested by the other was due to the property which the infant had or would receive. At that time the present guardian agreed that if appointed, she would support the infant and that no part of the infant’s property would be used for his support and education. A provision to that effect was incorporated in the decree with the qualification, however, that if it became necessary to apply any part thereof for such purposes, an order of the surrogate should be applied for, upon notice to such persons, if any, as he might direct. Upon this application, the surrogate directed that notice be given to the paternal grandmother and she opposes the application. It is set forth in the moving papers that since her appointment as' guardian the petitioner and her husband have adopted the infant.

There was precedent for attaching conditions to the appointment of the guardian. Derickson v. Derickson, 4 Dem. 295; Matter of Wagner, 75 Misc. Rep. 419; Matter of Mancini, 89 id. 83; Matter of Lamb’s Estate, 139 N. Y. Supp. 685; Matter of Cross, 92 Misc. Rep. 89; affd., 174 App. Div. 872. Under the circumstances, the duty of supporting and maintaining the infant rests upon the foster father by reason of the adoption, and in the event of his inability, upon the guardian, owing to the facts above stated. If it is shown, however, that the circumstances of the foster father and guardian are now such that they cannot perform that duty or that special expenses have been incurred which were necessary for the welfare of the infant and which they cannot pay, then the infant should not suffer for that reason and an .allowance should be made.

Among the items making up the amount asked for are some for medical attendance and medicines, expenses somewhat out of the ordinary, and also one for the premium on the guardian’s bond aggregating $105. This amount together with the sum of $25 costs will be allowed to the guardian. If at any time the foster father and the guardian deem it advisable that special advantages be given to the infant which they believe warranted by reason of the income which he has, and which they are unable to defray, or if the infant is in need of medical attention or the financial condition of the foster father and guardian becomes such that they cannot perform the duty imposed upon them, the court will entertain an application for an allowance. The foster parents and guardian are charged with the duty of seeing that the best interests of the infant are at all times subserved.

[115]*115Upon a prior application, an allowance of $100 was made to the guardian upon which no order was ever entered and which application it was stated the guardian now desires to withdraw. An order may, therefore, be entered upon this application allowing the guardian the sum of $105 and the sum of $25 costs and permitting a withdrawal of the application heretofore made.

Decreed accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 Misc. 113, 205 N.Y.S. 364, 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-guardianship-of-farrell-nysurct-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack