In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Winn Television Corp.

281 A.D. 908, 120 N.Y.S.2d 257, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3745

This text of 281 A.D. 908 (In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Winn Television Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Winn Television Corp., 281 A.D. 908, 120 N.Y.S.2d 257, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3745 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

Appeal by an assignee for the benefit of creditors from so much of an order made by an Official Referee which denied its application to expunge the claim of an officer of the assignor and deferred payment of dividends on his claim “ pending the institution of a plenary suit 6 * * and the determination therein of the issues based upon the claims” of the assignee against [909]*909said officer. Order, insofar as appealed from, modified on the law by striking therefrom the second ordering paragraph, and as so modified the order is affirmed, without costs, and matter remitted to Special Term, Part I of the Supreme Court, Kings County, to hear and determine the objections made by the assignee to the claims filed by respondent Geth and assigned by him to respondent Zenith Radio Corporation of N. Y. In view of the provision in the order dated April 15, 1952, denying the application for judgment, from which no appeal was taken, the Official Referee was not required to take proof as to the claimed preferences. Moreover, such claims have, since the entry of the order appealed from, been made the subject of an action by the assignee. The Official Referee, however, according to the stipulation refused to take proof as to the validity of the claims filed by respondent Geth. The assignee for the benefit of creditors was entitled to have a determination as to the validity of the claims. Such determination would have been binding on the assignee of respondent Geth, which had filed its assignment. (Matter of Creveling & Son Corp., 259 App. Div. 351, affd. 283 N. Y. 760; Matter of Morgan, 99 N. Y. 145.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, MacCrate and Beldock, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Accounting of Morgan
1 N.E. 406 (New York Court of Appeals, 1885)
Matter of John C. Creveling Son Corporation
28 N.E.2d 975 (New York Court of Appeals, 1940)
In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of John C. Creveling & Son Corp.
259 A.D. 351 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 A.D. 908, 120 N.Y.S.2d 257, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-general-assignment-for-the-benefit-of-creditors-of-winn-nyappdiv-1953.