In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Siegel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Siegel

230 A.D. 868

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 230 A.D. 868 (In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Siegel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Siegel, 230 A.D. 868 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion to direct assignee to redeliver premises and stock to the marshal and to declare that attaching creditors have a prior lien upon the assets reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion the appellant, as a marshal of the city of New York, made a valid levy under a proper warrant of attachment, upon the personal property of Siegel prior to the making of the general assignment for the benefit of creditors, and that the appellant did not relinquish his levy or surrender the said property to the assignee. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion to direct assignee to redeliver premises and stock to the marshal and to declare that attaching creditors have a prior lien upon the assets reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion the appellant, as a marshal of the city of New York, made a valid levy under a proper warrant of attachment, upon the personal property of Siegel prior to the making of the general assignment for the benefit of creditors, and that the appellant did not relinquish his levy or surrender the said property to the assignee. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 A.D. 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-general-assignment-for-the-benefit-of-creditors-of-siegel-nyappdiv-1930.