In re the Forfeiture of One 1986 Black Chevrolet Pick-Up Truck, Model CC30943, Florida Registration EG-8910, Vin No. 1GCHC33W5GS138126

532 So. 2d 1344, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2427, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4762, 1988 WL 114620
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 2, 1988·No. No. 88-0069·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment of forfeiture. Although the instructions given to the jury were inconsistent, the practical effect of the instructions was to influence the jury in appellant’s favor, rather than to his injury. See Farish v. Smoot, 58 So.2d 534 (Fla.1952). We find appellant’s second point is without merit and does not warrant discussion.

DOWNEY, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Forfeiture of One 1986 Black Chevrolet Pick-Up Truck, Model CC30943, Florida Registration EG-8910, Vin No. 1GCHC33W5GS138126, 532 So. 2d 1344, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2427, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4762, 1988 WL 114620 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

532 So. 2d 1344 (In re the Forfeiture of One 1986 Black Chevrolet Pick-Up Truck, Model CC30943, Florida Registration EG-8910, Vin No. 1GCHC33W5GS138126) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Farish v. Smoot
58 So. 2d 534 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1952)