In re the Final & Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Halsted
110 A.D. 909, 95 N.Y.S. 1131
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1905·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinions
Decree of Surrogate's Court of Dutchess county affirmed on the opinion of the surrogate. (Reported in 44 Mise. Rep. 176.) Woodward, Jenks and Miller, JJ., concurred; Rich, J., read for reversal, with whom Bartlett, J., concurred.
Appeal from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Dutchess county, entered bn the 25th.day of July, 1904.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Final & Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Halsted, 110 A.D. 909, 95 N.Y.S. 1131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).
110 A.D. 909 (In re the Final & Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Halsted) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Goldstick
177 A.D.2d 225 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re the Accounting of Chemical Bank & Trust Co.
191 Misc. 893 (New York Supreme Court, 1947)
In re the Estate of Mann
147 Misc. 873 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1933)
In re the Estate of Walsh
143 Misc. 223 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1932)
American Bonding Co. of Baltimore v. Richardson
214 F. 897 (Sixth Circuit, 1914)