In re the Final Account of the of Diehl
103 A. 822, 89 N.J. Eq. 209, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 323
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Ordinary Foster.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner-13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Final Account of the of Diehl, 103 A. 822, 89 N.J. Eq. 209, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 323 (N.J. 1918).
103 A. 822 (In re the Final Account of the of Diehl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re the Estate of Romnes
398 A.2d 543 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1979)
Hagy v. Kelly
39 A.2d 386 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1944)
Squier v. Martin
24 A.2d 865 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1942)
Morristown Trust Co. v. Childs
17 A.2d 559 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1940)
Gates v. Plainfield Trust Co.
191 A. 304 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1937)
Rice v. Gould
164 A. 41 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)