In re the Examination of Viall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Examination of Viall

263 A.D. 1059, 34 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8031

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 18, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 1059 (In re the Examination of Viall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Examination of Viall, 263 A.D. 1059, 34 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8031 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Order modified by reducing the amount of the fine from $285 to $125 and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Order denying motion to vacate the contempt order affirmed, without costs of this appeal tó either party. Memorandum: We think the motion to vacate or open the contempt order was properly denied. That the defendant was guilty of contempt was clear. In view of the fact that the defendant’s conduct caused no direct loss to the judgment creditor and that the Special Term did not find his conduct to be willful or contumacious, we think the ends of justice wifi be served by reducing the fine from $285 to $125. All concur.. (One order adjudges the judgment debtor to have committed a civil contempt of court and imposes a fine and sentences him to imprisonment unless said fine is paid. The second order denied a motion of the judgment debtor to vacate the previous order.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and MeCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified by reducing the amount of the fine from $285 to $125 and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Order denying motion to vacate the contempt order affirmed, without costs of this appeal tó either party. Memorandum: We think the motion to vacate or open the contempt order was properly denied. That the defendant was guilty of contempt was clear. In view of the fact that the defendant’s conduct caused no direct loss to the judgment creditor and that the Special Term did not find his conduct to be willful or contumacious, we think the ends of justice wifi be served by reducing the fine from $285 to $125. All concur.. (One order adjudges the judgment debtor to have committed a civil contempt of court and imposes a fine and sentences him to imprisonment unless said fine is paid. The second order denied a motion of the judgment debtor to vacate the previous order.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and MeCurn, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 1059, 34 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-examination-of-viall-nyappdiv-1942.