In re the Estates of Waters

355 P.2d 8, 56 Wash. 2d 717, 1960 Wash. LEXIS 405
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 8, 1960
DocketNo. 35332
StatusPublished

This text of 355 P.2d 8 (In re the Estates of Waters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estates of Waters, 355 P.2d 8, 56 Wash. 2d 717, 1960 Wash. LEXIS 405 (Wash. 1960).

Opinion

Finley, J.

— This is an appeal by Will M. Derig from a judgment awarding him the sum of two hundred fifty dollars as payment in full for services rendered as attorney for the administratrix of the estates of Betty Mae Waters and Leonard Deylone Waters, both deceased. Appellant Derig contends that the aforesaid amount is inadequate in relation to the time and effort he expended in handling the business and affairs of the estates. Respondent administratrix takes issue with appellant’s claims. Principally, she asserts that appellant has already been paid for certain of the services for which he now seeks compensation. The [718]*718amount to be awarded to an attorney, as compensation for services rendered for an estate, is essentially within the discretion of the trial court. In re Krueger’s Estate (1941), 11 Wn. (2d) 329, 119 P. (2d) 312. However, in the instant case we are unable to determine whether that discretion was properly exercised, since the trial court has entered no findings of fact relating to the disputed factual issues raised by the parties. Therefore, in accordance with the views expressed in Bowman v. Webster (1953), 42 Wn. (2d) 129, 253 P. (2d) 934, and cases cited therein, the judgment of the trial court is set aside, and the cause remanded with directions to the judge who tried the action to make and enter findings of fact concerning the material issues, appropriate conclusions of law, and to enter judgment thereon from which either party aggrieved may appeal.

Costs on this appeal shall abide the result of the action.

Weaver, C. J., Rosellini, Foster, and Hunter, JJ., concur'.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bowman v. Webster
253 P.2d 934 (Washington Supreme Court, 1953)
In Re Krueger's Estate
119 P.2d 312 (Washington Supreme Court, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
355 P.2d 8, 56 Wash. 2d 717, 1960 Wash. LEXIS 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estates-of-waters-wash-1960.