In re the Estate Thorne

108 A.D.2d 865, 485 N.Y.S.2d 383, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43190
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 19, 1985·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

In a contested probate proceeding, the objectant appeals from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County (Bloom, S.), dated August 11, 1983, which, after a nonjury trial, admitted the decedent’s will to probate.

Decree affirmed, with costs payable personally by appellant.

The determination of this case hinged on the credibility of the witnesses, and the findings of the Surrogate, who presided at the trial and heard all of the testimony, are entitled to great weight (Matter of Anonymous, 81 AD2d 865, 866; Matter of Gloria S. v Richard B., 80 AD2d 72, 76).

We decline to disturb the findings of the Surrogate, that the testator had sufficient testamentary capacity on the date of the execution of the will, that the will was validly executed, and that it was not procured by undue influence. Mangano, J. P., Weinstein, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate Thorne, 108 A.D.2d 865, 485 N.Y.S.2d 383, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43190 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

108 A.D.2d 865 (In re the Estate Thorne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MAKITRA, WILLIAM T., MTR. OF
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
In re the Estate of Makitra
101 A.D.3d 1579 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
In re Feinberg
149 A.D.2d 510 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)