In re the Estate of Zinna
This text of 282 A.D.2d 541 (In re the Estate of Zinna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 104 and SCPA 1809 (1), the petitioner appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County (Radigan, S.), dated March 9, 2000, which ruled that a computer printout of the respondent’s records would be admissible at trial.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
[542]*542The Surrogate’s evidentiary ruling is neither appealable as of right nor by permission (see, Savarese v City of New York Hous. Auth., 172 AD2d 506, 509; Pellegrino v New York City Tr. Auth., 141 AD2d 709, 710). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
282 A.D.2d 541, 722 N.Y.S.2d 755, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-zinna-nyappdiv-2001.