In re the Estate of Zinna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Zinna

282 A.D.2d 541, 722 N.Y.S.2d 755, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3507

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 9, 2001·Published

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 104 and SCPA 1809 (1), the petitioner appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County (Radigan, S.), dated March 9, 2000, which ruled that a computer printout of the respondent’s records would be admissible at trial.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

[542] The Surrogate’s evidentiary ruling is neither appealable as of right nor by permission (see, Savarese v City of New York Hous. Auth., 172 AD2d 506, 509; Pellegrino v New York City Tr. Auth., 141 AD2d 709, 710). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 104 and SCPA 1809 (1), the petitioner appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County (Radigan, S.), dated March 9, 2000, which ruled that a computer printout of the respondent’s records would be admissible at trial.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

[542] The Surrogate’s evidentiary ruling is neither appealable as of right nor by permission (see, Savarese v City of New York Hous. Auth., 172 AD2d 506, 509; Pellegrino v New York City Tr. Auth., 141 AD2d 709, 710). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

In re the Estate of Zinna, 282 A.D.2d 541, 722 N.Y.S.2d 755, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3507 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

282 A.D.2d 541 (In re the Estate of Zinna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related