In re the Estate of Zietz
This text of 283 A.D. 778 (In re the Estate of Zietz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No proof of professional misconduct of any attorney is made in this record. However, on the facts that are concededly undisputed, we think in the exercise of this court’s discretion, the motion to substitute the attorneys respondents should not have been granted and the order of substitution should accordingly be reversed. With that disposition of the motion for substitution, any restraining order is unnecessary and academic. Settle order accordingly, without costs to either side. Present — -Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan and Botein, JJ.; Cohn, J., dissents and votes to affirm. [205 Misc. 20.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 A.D. 778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-zietz-nyappdiv-1954.