In re the Estate of Zacharda

Baltimore City Orphans' Court

In re the Estate of Zacharda

1 Balt. C. Rep. 477

DecidedNovember 2, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Balt. C. Rep. 477 (In re the Estate of Zacharda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Baltimore City Orphans' Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Zacharda, 1 Balt. C. Rep. 477 (Md. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

LINDSAY, GANS and EDWARDS, J.

This case comes before the Court by petition of Mary Zacharda, claiming to be the widow of the deceased, and praying that the letters of administration granted to Francis J. Rohan, be revoked, on the grounds that she was the widow, and entitled to the same.

This petition is answered by the administrator, denying that the petitioner was the legal widow of the deceased, and that she has no claims upon the estate, and that the legal wife is still living in a foreign land.

[478]*478After giving the matter a careful hearing of the testimony and argument of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that the petitioner has not shown sufficient reasons to justify the Court in revoking the letters heretofore granted, and, therefore, dismisses the petition with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LINDSAY, GANS and EDWARDS, J.

This case comes before the Court by petition of Mary Zacharda, claiming to be the widow of the deceased, and praying that the letters of administration granted to Francis J. Rohan, be revoked, on the grounds that she was the widow, and entitled to the same.

This petition is answered by the administrator, denying that the petitioner was the legal widow of the deceased, and that she has no claims upon the estate, and that the legal wife is still living in a foreign land.

[478]*478After giving the matter a careful hearing of the testimony and argument of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that the petitioner has not shown sufficient reasons to justify the Court in revoking the letters heretofore granted, and, therefore, dismisses the petition with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Balt. C. Rep. 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-zacharda-mdorphanctbalt-1894.