In re the Estate of Westlake

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Westlake

173 A.D. 905, 157 N.Y.S. 1150

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1916·Published

Opinion

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The petitioner has sufficient interest to initiate the proceeding. The question whether the Statute of Limitations is a bar is not decided, as the court is not fully advised of the will of George West-lake, or of the decree, or duration of Minnie A. Waldecker’s participation in the administration of it, or her attitude towards it. (Matter of Jordan, 50 App. Div. 344; Matter of Irvin, 68 id. 158, 163; Matter of Meyer, 98 id. 7; affd., 181 N. Y. 553; Matter of Ashheim, 111 App. Div. 176; Matter of Williams, 57 Misc. Rep. 537.) Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The petitioner has sufficient interest to initiate the proceeding. The question whether the Statute of Limitations is a bar is not decided, as the court is not fully advised of the will of George West-lake, or of the decree, or duration of Minnie A. Waldecker’s participation in the administration of it, or her attitude towards it. (Matter of Jordan, 50 App. Div. 344; Matter of Irvin, 68 id. 158, 163; Matter of Meyer, 98 id. 7; affd., 181 N. Y. 553; Matter of Ashheim, 111 App. Div. 176; Matter of Williams, 57 Misc. Rep. 537.) Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

In re the Estate of Westlake, 173 A.D. 905, 157 N.Y.S. 1150 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

173 A.D. 905 (In re the Estate of Westlake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related