In re the Estate of Weinmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Weinmann

268 A.D. 829, 50 N.Y.S.2d 179, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3650

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 3, 1944

StatusPublished

This text of 268 A.D. 829 (In re the Estate of Weinmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Weinmann, 268 A.D. 829, 50 N.Y.S.2d 179, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3650 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by petitioner from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings County, vacating a prior decree of that court which granted ancillary letters of administration to petitioner, suspending the designation of petitioner to receive ancillary letters pending the duration of the war, and awarding ancillary letters of administration c. t. a. to the Public Administrator of Kings County. Decree unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Public Administrator of Kings County, payable out of the estate. No opinion. Close, P. J., Carswell, Adel and Aid-rich, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., concurs on the ground that the granting of ancillary letters of administration to the Public Administrator was within the discretion of the court. (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 161.) [181 Misc. 511; post, p. 862.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by petitioner from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings County, vacating a prior decree of that court which granted ancillary letters of administration to petitioner, suspending the designation of petitioner to receive ancillary letters pending the duration of the war, and awarding ancillary letters of administration c. t. a. to the Public Administrator of Kings County. Decree unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Public Administrator of Kings County, payable out of the estate. No opinion. Close, P. J., Carswell, Adel and Aid-rich, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., concurs on the ground that the granting of ancillary letters of administration to the Public Administrator was within the discretion of the court. (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 161.) [181 Misc. 511; post, p. 862.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 A.D. 829, 50 N.Y.S.2d 179, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-weinmann-nyappdiv-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack